Philosophy of the Arts
This course considers questions such as: Is art purely cultural or partly biological? Is art old or an invention of eighteenth-century Europe? What definitions are plausible and if none are, how does the concept cohere? How does the philosophy of art differ from aesthetics as traditionally conceived? In what manner do artworks exist? Are they created or discovered? What constraints are there on the interpretation of art? Do artistic evaluations always contain a personal element? How does an abstract art form express emotion? Why are we moved by the fate of characters we know to be fictional? Why are we drawn to tragedies when we know the experience of them is unpleasant? How do paintings represent what they picture? How do art paintings differ from drawn advertisements and photographs? Can we learn from art truths about the actual world? Are ethical faults in art also artistic demerits?
At the end of the course you should have an appreciation of the representative theories and arguments presented by philosophers who have addressed these questions. You should be able to explain these theories and arguments in your own words and in a way that shows good familiarity with the prescribed readings.
Coursework + exam
For full course information see the Digital Course Outline for PHIL 212.
Digital Course Outlines are refreshed in November for the following year. Digital Course Outlines for courses to be offered for the first time may be published slightly later.
Not taught in 2023
Stephen DAVIES. The Philosophy of Art. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. 2nd ed. ISBN: 978-1-119-09165-3. (Available as an e-book via the library.)
Theodore Gracyk, The Philosophy of Art: An Introduction, (Cambridge: Polity, 2012)
Robert Stecker, Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: An Introduction, (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010, 2nd ed.)
Coursework + exam
PHIL 212: 15 points
30 points in Philosophy, or 90 points