Faculty of Arts


FTVMS 101 - Notes - Week 3

BROKEN BLOSSOMS

1. Historical milieu

2. Background of the film

Plot/story

Actors/acting – their ongoing influence

Clip - Lillian Gish -- François Truffaut's Day for Night

3. the use of form to make social comment

Clip – direct address to camera

Clip - Gish on the making of Broken Blossoms

4. Genre

Basics of melodrama

main characteristics of melodrama

setting up the two male characters

clip Yellow Man in the temple

clip Burrows at home

Clip Burrows comes into focus.

The trope of the oriental monk

In her essay "The Oriental Monk in American Popular Culture" Jane Naomi Iwamura writes of Broken Blossoms as foundational to contemporary genre, succinctly highlighting her point by positing the idea of a modern rewrite and remake.

If [Broken] Blossoms were rewritten in more contemporary terms ... the Yellow Man would arrive as noble and pious as before, but this time as a kung fu master with magical powers. He would rescue Lucy from her depraved, abusive father, care for her, and finally train her in the spiritual ways and practices of the East. Battlin' Burrows, now a frustrated blue-collar worker obsessed with war and guns, would then attempt to reclaim his estranged daughter, and the film would culminate in a final showdown between the two father figures and their respective forms of combat and defense. Lucy would get into the act as well, employing her new talents to disarm her father as gently as possible. The Yellow Man and the girl, through superior human insight and bodily discipline, would triumph over their unruly counterpart. After his definitive defeat, Battlin' would lay aside his weapons, be reunited with his daughter, and the three would join forces to fight evil and corruption in Blossoms II. So ends Griffith's classic rewritten for a late-twentieth-century audience - once a cautionary tale and now transfigured into a narrative of spiritual hope and progress.

Bruce David Forbes and Jeffrey Mahan ed. Religion and Popular Culture in America. Berkley: The University of California Press, 2000.


Contact details | Search | Accessibility | Copyright | Privacy | Disclaimer | 1